Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief

Sam Prough

doi:10.29333/ajqr/12440

Sam Prough ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 60-73

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

OPEN ACCESS 1047 Views 641 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

While observation research strives to capture the diverse experiences of participants, a researcher’s interpretation is often foregrounded in the work. As a result, those observed and how they interpret the meaning of their actions can fade into the background. I argue for a shift in traditional models of observation to include an observation debrief to unite the purpose of interview and observation while centering the participant’s perspective through a more immediate reflection of a participant’s observed experience. I describe the benefit of an observation debrief through a narrative account of one participant in a study about parents’ mathematical interactions with young children.

Keywords: debrief, mathematics education, narrative, observation, parent engagement.

References

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). SAGE Publications.
Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A complex research method. Library Trends, 55(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0045
Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2021). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0
Boyd, T. B. H., & Mitchell, D., Jr. (2018). Black male persistence in spite of facing stereotypes in college: A phenomenological exploration. The Qualitative Report, 23(4), 893–913. https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/fac_staff_pubs
Bratich, J. (2018). Observation in a surveilled world. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 526–545). SAGE Publications.
Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ construction of the good mother. Gender & Society: Official Publication of Sociologists for Women in Society, 26(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211427700
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Copland, F. (2018). Observation and fieldnotes. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 249–268). Palgrave Macmillan.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2012). Practical considerations. In Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed., pp. 19–44). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davys, A. M., & Beddoe, L. (2015). “Going live”: A negotiated collaborative model for live observation of practice. Practice, 27(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1032234
Goldman, S. (2005). A new angle on families: Connecting the mathematics of life with school mathematics. Learning in Places: The Informal Education Reader, 249, 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/367685a0
Grimm, E. D., Kaufman, T., & Doty, D. (2014). Rethinking classroom observation. Professional Learning: Reimagined, 71(8), 24–29.
Jay, T., Rose, J., & Simmons, B. (2018). Why Is parental involvement in children’s mathematics learning hard? Parental perspectives on their role supporting children’s learning. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018775466
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466
Knutas, A. (2019). Shadowing or what? Experience of shadowing acts of being in the field of education. Qualitative Inquiry: QI, 25(7), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806620
Kogan, J. R., Hatala, R., Hauer, K. E., & Holmboe, E. (2017). Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(5), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7
Kondo, D. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. The University of Chicago Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
May, R. A. B., Buford May, R. A., & Pattillo-McCoy, M. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600105
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. The Guilford Press.
Mero-Jaffe, I. (2011). “Is that what I said?” Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000304
Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed., pp. 137–161). Jossey-Bass. O’Leary, M., & Cui, V. (2020). Reconceptualising teaching and learning in higher education: Challenging neoliberal narratives of teaching excellence through collaborative observation. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1543262
Prough, S. (2021). Mathematical mothers: Investigating shifts in perspective around what counts as mathematics. In D. Olanoff, K. Johnson, & S. Spitzer (Eds.), Productive struggle: Persevering through challenges: Proceedings of the 43^rd meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 775-783).
Rapley, T. (2004). Interviews. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 15–33). SAGE Publications.
Rolón-Dow, R., & Bailey, M. J. (2022). Insights on narrative analysis from a study of racial microaggressions and microaffirmations. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11456
Rowlands, J. (2021). Interviewee transcript review as a tool to improve data quality and participant confidence in sensitive research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211066170
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Warren, C. A. (2013). The utility of empathy for White female teachers’ culturally responsive interactions with Black male students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 175–200.
Winchester-Seeto, T., & Rowe, A. D. (2019). Who is holding the mirror? Debriefing and reflection in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20(4), 335–349.

Citation

Prough, S. (2022). Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(3), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

Prough, S. (2022). Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(3), pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

Prough S. Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(3), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

Prough, Sam. "Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2022 6 no. 3 (2022): 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

Prough, Sam "Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 2022, pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440

Prough S. Whose Interpretation Matters? Centering Participants Through Observation Debrief. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(3):60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12440