Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography

Shams Shams

doi:10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams Shams ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp. 249-268

https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

OPEN ACCESS 35 Views 18 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Reflexivity has become a central ethical and methodological imperative in contemporary ethnography, routinely framed as a means through which researchers manage discomfort, resolve ethical tension, and maintain accountability in the field. Yet reflexivity does not always dissolve discomfort, but it can intensify it. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with religious minorities in Pakistan, shaped by asymmetrical power, uneven trust, and unsettled obligation, this article argues that discomfort is not a failure of method to be corrected but a methodological condition through which ethnographic knowledge is produced. Through a series of fieldwork vignettes, I demonstrate how moments of ethical unease when empathy proves insufficient, reciprocity impossible, and responsibility unresolved generate critical insight rather than methodological breakdown. I identify four functions discomfort performs: signalling structural asymmetry, limit-testing ethical frameworks, registering relational excess, and enabling epistemological reorientation. By reconceptualizing discomfort as constitutive rather than incidental to ethnographic practice, this article challenges normative expectations of reflexive resolution and contributes to ongoing debates on ethics, positionality, and method in qualitative research.

Keywords: Reflexivity, Discomfort, Ethnographic Ethics; Positionality, Extractivism

References

Ali, R. (2015). Rethinking representation: negotiating positionality, power and space in the field. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(6), 783–800.
Amir, A., Mandler, D., Hauptman, S., & Gorev, D. (2017). Discomfort as a means of pre-service teachers’ professional development–an action research as part of the ‘Research Literacy’course. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 231-245.
Bayeck, R. Y. (2022). Positionality: The interplay of space, context and identity. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21.
Bieler, P., Bister, M. D., Hauer, J., Klausner, M., Niewöhner, J., Schmid, C., & Von Peter, S. (2021). Distributing reflexivity through co-laborative ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 77-98.
Bothello, J., & Bonfim, L. (2023). Marginalized communities and the problem of research extraction. Journal of Management Studies, 62(1), 526-532.
Burdick, J., & Sandlin, J. A. (2010). Inquiry as answerability: Toward a methodology of discomfort in researching critical public pedagogies. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 349-360.
Butler, J. (2016). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso Books.
Campbell, S. G. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples . Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
Carr, M. (2026). Moments of discomfort: rethinking reflexivity and researcher subjectivities through affect and poststructuralism. Gender, Work & Organization, 33(2), 483-494.
Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as method. Routledge Publisher.
Chilmeran, Y., & Hedström, J. (2022). Reflexivity and fieldwork in feminist peace research. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies (pp. 1264-1270). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Clarke, R., Chadwick, K., & Williams, P. (2017). Critical social research as a ‘site of resistance’: Reflections on relationships, power and positionality. Justice, Power and Resistance, 261-282.
Consoli, S., & Ganassin, S. (2025). Reflexivity as a means to address researcher vulnerabilities. Applied Linguistics Review, 16(6), 2521-2544.
Dado, M., Spence, J. R., & Elliot, J. (2023). The case of contradictions: How prolonged engagement, reflexive journaling, and observations can contradict qualitative methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.
Darling, J. (2014). Emotions, encounters and expectations: The uncertain ethics of ‘the field’. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(2) , 201-212 .
Di Placido, M. (2023). “Scholar–Practitioners”, Reflexivity and the Illusio of the Field: Ethnography, Yoga Studies and the Social Scientific Study of Religion. Societies, 13(8), 195.
Drenten, J., & Gurrieri, L. (2025). Conducting qualitative social media research through a feminist ethic of care. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 28(3), 377-407.
Falconer Al-Hindi, K., & Eaves, L. E. (2023). Feminist research methods and intersectionality: An introduction to the focus section. The Professional Geographer, 75(4), 642-647.
Gailloux, C., Furness, W. W., Myles, C. C., Wiley, D. S., & Collins, K. (2022). Fieldwork without the field: Navigating qualitative research in pandemic times. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 750409.
Gani, J. K., & Khan, R. M. (2024). Positionality statements as a function of coloniality: Interrogating reflexive methodologies. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2).
Gray, J. B. (2026). Meredith Grey and Me: A Nested Autoethnography of
Miscarriage. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(2), 296-320.
Geelhoed, F., Busher, J., Massé, L. E., & De Pelecijn, L. (2024). In the discomfort zone: emotional labor and reflexivity in field research on extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1-22.
Godrie, B. (2025). Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalized communities. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 18(1), 1-14.
Hamdan, A. K. (2009). Reflexivity of Discomfort in Insider-Outsider Educational Research. McGill Journal of Education, 44(3), 377–404.
Hess, J. (2018). A “discomfortable” approach to music education Re-envisioning the "strange encounter". Philosophy of Music Education Review, 26(1), 24-45.
Ice, G. H., Dufour, D. L., & Stevens, N. J. (2015). Disasters in field research: preparing for and coping with unexpected events. . Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Ide, Y., & Beddoe, L. (2024). Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 23(4), 725-740.
Jacob, P. (2024). A Working Paper on Forced Conversions. Lahore: Centre for Social Justice.
Jia, X. (2023). Co-existing with uncomfortable reflexivity: Feminist fieldwork abroad during the pandemic. In Difficult Conversations (pp. 113-129). Routledge.
Jones, C. H., & Huddlestone, E. (2025). Disrupting the self: self-identity, discomfort and (un) becoming through the research process. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(5), 1128-1142.
Karcher, K., McCuaig, J., & King-Hill, S. (2024). (Self-) reflection/reflexivity in sensitive, qualitative research: A scoping review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23.
Khan, M., Mahmood, T., & Rasool, S. (2023). Dynamics of violence in Pakistan: A mixed method study. Global Educational Studies Review, VIII, 8, 287-296.
Kinitz, D. J. (2022). The emotional and psychological labor of insider qualitative research among systemically marginalized groups: Revisiting the uses of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 32(11), 1635-1647.
Leonard, S., & Ward, A. (2026). Tales from the (disrupted) field: Contemplating interruptions, disruptions, and ethnography amidst a pandemic. Ethnography, 27(1).
Levitt, H. M. (2024). A consideration of the influence of researchers’ lived experiences: Reflections on epistemic privilege and social justice in qualitative research . Qualitative Psychology, 11(3), 315–327.
Louw, H. (2025). Sitting Through Discomfort: Reflexivity on Research With Dangerous Men in Danger Zones. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24.
McLay, K. F., Thomasse, L., & Reyes Jr, V. C. (2023). Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: sensemaking through reflexive inquiry. Educational technology research and development, 71(3), 1161-1177.
Mitchell, J., Boettcher, N., & Lashewicz, B. (2024). Reflexive practice in qualitative research: embracing tension, discomfort and ambiguity. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Quality (p. 346).
Muthanna, A., & Alduais, A. (2023). The interrelationship of reflexivity, sensitivity and integrity in conducting interviews. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 218.
Nikidehaghani, M., Hui-Truscott, F., & Cortese, C. (2023). Researching vulnerable participants: The role of critical reflexivity in overcoming methodological challenges. International Journal of Market Research, 65(2-3), 237-258.
Orel, M. (2024). Autoethnography in the modern workplace: a reflexive journey. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 13(2), 144-160.
Palacios, M., & Baldauf, A. (2023). From Extractivism to Adjacency. A Research Manifesto. Emancipations: A Journal of Critical Social Analysis, 2(1), 9.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175-196.
Ploder, A. (2022). Strong reflexivity and vulnerable researchers. On the epistemological requirement of academic kindness. Queer-Feminist Science & Technology Studies Forum, 7, 25-38.
Pugh, A. J., & Mosseri, S. (2023). Trust-building vs.“just trust me”: Reflexivity and resonance in ethnography. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1069305.
Ricker, B. (2018). Reflexivity, Positionality, and Rigor. In Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research, (p. 70).
Roshan, A., & Elhami, A. (2024). Ethnographic research methods and the role of reflexivity in qualitative research. In Principles of conducting qualitative research in multicultural settings (pp. 1-14). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Rowlands, E. (2022). Autoethnography, reflexivity, and insider researcher dynamics. African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine de Sociologie, 26(1), 6-25.
Scraton, P. (2016). Bearing witness to the ‘pain of others’: Researching power, violence and resistance in a women’s prison’. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(1), 5-20.
Singleton, B., Gillette, M. B., Burman, A., & Blanes, R. (2022). Uncomfortable knowledge: Toward a pedagogy of reflexivity. Teaching Anthropology, 11(2), 73-85.
Soderstrom, J., Holdo, M., & Junman, A. (2025). Uncomfortable interviews: A research journey of discomfort and how to make the most of it. Qualitative Research, 25(5), 1041-1061.
Spellman, C. (2025). Intersectional reflexivity and an uncomfortable account of researcher privilege. Management Learning, 56(4), 703-719.
Trundle, C., Araújo, N., Khan, S., & Phillips, T. (2025). Beyond the mirror: Challenging the common assumptions of reflexivity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24.
Türkmen, G. (2023). Reflexivity and positionality in qualitative research: On being an outsider in the field. In The political psychology of Kurds in Turkey: Critical perspectives on identity, narratives, and resistance (pp. 145-166). Springer Inter.

Citation

Shams, S. (2026). Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams, S. (2026). Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), pp. 249-268. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams S. Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams, Shams. "Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2026 10 no. 3 (2026): 249-268. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams, Shams "Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 3, 2026, pp. 249-268. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539

Shams S. Discomfort as a Methodological Condition: When Reflexivity Is Not Enough in Ethnography. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3):249-68. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18539