Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool

David C Coker

doi:10.66815/ajqr/18485

David C Coker ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp. 95-125

https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

OPEN ACCESS 9 Views 1 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Themes and thematic analysis are very popular in qualitative research methods and analysis. The very definition of theme varies widely, from patterns that exclude the researcher as biased to highly interpretive work that prizes the researcher's instrumentality. Exploring the historical development of themes, the many definitions reveal that different levels of analysis produced varied understandings of the meanings of concepts and themes. A qualitative analysis of educational leadership dissertations in the US using thematic analysis showed that a common practice was to state that themes emerged; regardless of the claims, the resultant themes were mostly topical and descriptive. The construction of themes beyond the descriptive is a practice for which many researchers lack systematic, rigorous processes and fail to show visible methods. To develop a methodical, visible practice, a theme construction tool provides a three-step framework to use a storyboard approach to develop concepts, produce hypotheses using abductive reasoning, and then evaluate hypotheses to make an inference to the best explanation. Criteria for evaluating themes provide a reference point for researchers to apply concrete skills across a range of qualitative methods. The paper serves as a call to action for researchers to adopt structured, transparent, and methodologically flexible tools for theme construction. By doing so, researchers can move beyond simple summarization and opaque claims of “emerge” to produce more credible, nuanced, and genuinely interpretive themes.

Keywords: Qualitative Methods, Themes, Thematic Analysis, Qualitative Analysis, Interpretative

References

Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Becker, H., & Geer, B. (1957). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. Human Organization, 16(3), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.16.3.k687822132323013
Belmonte, I. A., & McCabe-Hidalgo, A. (1998). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. Didáctica, 10(1), 13-31.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024a). A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promotion International, 39(3), daae049. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024b). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800
Braun, V., & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Liability or asset? Women talk about the vagina. Psychology of Women Section Review, 5(2), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspow.2003.5.2.28
Buetow, S. (2010). Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘saliency analysis’. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15(2), 123-125. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009081
Burnard, K. J. (2024). Developing a robust case study protocol. Management Research Review, 47(2), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2021-0821
Calzavarini, F., & Cevolani, G. (2022). Abductive reasoning in cognitive neuroscience: Weak and strong reverse inference. Synthese, 200(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03585-2
Carter, M. J., & Carter, S. (2014). How themes in literature can inform sociological theory, research, and teaching. The American Sociologist, 45, 388-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9221-1
Christou, P. A. (2022). How to use thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2023.0006
Coker, D. C., & Akande, A. (2025). Preparation, development, and refinement of the interview protocol in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 30(8), 4205-4235. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2025.7964
Coker, D. C. (2021). Making thematic analysis systematic: The seven deadly sins. Journal of Studies in Education, 11(3), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v11i3.18882
Coker, D. C. (2022). A thematic analysis of the structure of delimitations in the dissertation. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.28945/4939
Coker, D. C. (2023). An integrative qualitative framework: Improving research through strategic mapping. International Research in Education, 11(1), 66-109. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v11i1.20921
Coker, D. C., Kaaki, W., & Miao, X. D. (2025). Qualitative research in leadership and organizational studies. In A. Akande (Ed.), Organizational behavior: Current science, models, and applications. Springer.
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic analysis approach: A step by step guide for ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1-2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
de Farias, B. G., Dutra-Thomé, L., Koller, S. H., & de Castro, T. G. (2021). Formulation of themes in qualitative research: Logical procedures and analytical paths. Trends in Psychology, 29(1), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-020-00052-0
DeSantis, L., & Ugarriza, D. N. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394590002200308
Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 147-159). Wiley.
Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: The ‘good’, the ‘bad’, and the ‘ugly’. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3062
Fischer, H. R. (2001). Abductive reasoning as a way of worldmaking. Foundations of Science, 6, 361-383. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011671106610
Francis, G. (1989). Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word, 40(1-2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1989.11435804
Fryer, T. (2022). A critical realist approach to thematic analysis: producing causal explanations. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(4), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2022.2076776
Glaser, B. G. (2008). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Grounded Theory Review, 7(3), 3-12. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/467
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 395–410). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22
Holton, J. A. (2008). Grounded theory as a general research methodology. Grounded Theory Review, 7(02), 27-45. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/429
Jules, T. D., & Salajan, F. D. (2024). Toward the (post) qualitative turn in comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 68(2), 199-211. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/730517
Karlsen, B., Hillestad, T. M., & Dysvik, E. (2021). Abductive reasoning in nursing: Challenges and possibilities. Nursing Inquiry, 28(1), e12374. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12374
Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/208674
Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013). The processes of inference. Argument & Computation, 4(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2012.674060
Khurshid, F., van der Veen, M., Thompson, J., & Hegazi, I. (2024). Navigating thematic analysis: Practical strategies grounded in abductive reasoning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2024.2349887
Kidd, I. J. (2016). Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.006
Kim, J. H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage Publications.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420130102
Kushnir, I. (2025). Thematic analysis in the area of education: A practical guide. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2471645. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2471645
Lehr, S. (1990). Literature and the construction of meaning: The preschool child's developing sense of theme. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568549009594801
Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE09133
Luborsky, M. R. (1994). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In J. F. Gubrium & A. Sankar (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 189–210). Sage Publications, Inc.
Lucas, K., & D’Enbeau, S. (2013). Moving beyond themes: Reimagining the qualitative analysis curriculum. Qualitative Communication Research, 2(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2013.2.2.213
Lyhne, C. N., Thisted, J., & Bjerrum, M. (2025). Qualitative content analysis–framing the analytical process of inductive content analysis to develop a sound study design. Quality & Quantity, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02220-9
Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017
Majumdar, A. (2019). Thematic analysis in qualitative research. In Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 197-220). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Maxwell, J. A. (2021). The importance of qualitative research for investigating causation. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000219
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage.
Mishra, S., & Dey, A. K. (2022). Understanding and identifying ‘themes’ in qualitative case study research. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221134659
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
Morgan, D. L. (2018). Themes, theories, and models. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323177501
Morriss, L. (2024). Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 23(5), 745-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250241277355
Mukumbang, F. C. (2023). Retroductive theorizing: A contribution of critical realism to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211049847
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231205789. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M., & Frels, R. K. (2013). Foreword: Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to frame quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.2
Özden, M. (2024). Content and thematic analysis techniques in qualitative research: Purpose, process and features. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 2(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.20
Paul, G. (1993). Approaches to abductive reasoning: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 7(2), 109-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849080
Peel, K. L. (2020). A beginner’s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/ryr5-k983
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
Reichertz, J. (2010). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.1.1412
Ross, L. N. (2024). Causal constraints in the life and social sciences. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1068-1077. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.165
Russell, B. (1935, January). The limits of empiricism. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 36, pp. 131-150). Aristotelian Society, Wiley.
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
Sagan, C. (2007). The fine art of baloney detection. In B. Farha (Ed.), Paranormal claims: A critical analysis (pp. 1-12). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(4), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1086/209413
Swain, J. (2018). A hybrid approach to thematic analysis in qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435477
Tavory, I. (2020). Interviews and inference: Making sense of interview data in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 43(4), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09464-x
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17-37). Sage.
Tesch, R. (1987). Emerging themes: The researcher’s experience. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 230-241. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandp15058
Thagard, P., & Shelley, C. (1997). Abductive reasoning: Logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In Logic and scientific methods: Volume one of the Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 1995 (pp. 413-427). Springer.
Thompson, J. (2022). A guide to abductive thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(5), 1410-1421. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
Van Meegdenburg, H. (2023). Process tracing: An analyticist approach. In P. A. Mello & F. Ostermann (Eds.), Routledge handbook of foreign policy analysis methods (pp. 405-420). Taylor & Francis.
Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A step‐by‐step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181-5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481
Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. In G. Kaiser & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 81-100). Springer.
Watson, A., & Jackson, D. (2026). The art of analysis: Crafting credible and authentic qualitative results. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 82(2), 1716-1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.17032
Wieler, L. A. (2025). Qualitative data analysis framework for early career researchers: ARISE. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16529
Willig, C. (2012). Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Wiltshire, G., & Ronkainen, N. (2021). A realist approach to thematic analysis: Making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes. Journal of Critical Realism, 20(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1894909
Wynn, G. (2024). Reformative concept analysis for applied psychology qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(3), 251-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2346851
Xu, W. (2026). Doing thematic analysis in the age of generative AI: Practices, ethics and reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 25, 16094069261425173. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261425173

Citation

Coker, D. C. (2026). Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), 95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

Coker, D. C. (2026). Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), pp. 95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

Coker DC. Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3), 95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

Coker, David C. "Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2026 10 no. 3 (2026): 95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

Coker, David C "Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 3, 2026, pp. 95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485

Coker DC. Building the Thematic Structure in Qualitative Research: The Theme Construction Tool. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3):95-125. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/18485