Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol

Shelly Palmer; Laura Balis

doi:10.66815/ajqr/19192

Shelly Palmer ¹ ^* , Laura Balis ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp. 372-385

https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

OPEN ACCESS 18 Views 9 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Implementation science researchers continue to develop innovative methods to speed the translation of research to practice. One such approach, rapid qualitative analysis, which uses streamlined analytic tools to achieve rigorous results in an abbreviated timeline. While the Planning for and Assessing Rigor in Rapid Qualitative Analysis (PARRQA) framework provides clear guidance for consistently reporting findings, we realized a need for greater training protocols to support team members and answer practical questions. The purpose of this methodological note is to share our teams’ rapid deductive analysis protocol. The includes instructions for 1) developing a coding template that aligns with the interview questions, 2) coding the first interview and refining the template, 3) using a two-coder process to code remaining interviews , 4) using transcripts to select representative quotations, 5) checking quality throughout the process through senior researcher review and meeting debriefs, 6) using a two-coder process to write a summary and select an exemplar quotation for each question/construct, and 7) reporting results. This protocol supported our team in consistently applying rapid deductive approaches to qualitative analysis for deliverable development in a timely manner. Researchers continue to debate whether analysis approaches should be more or less rapid. We recommend using rapid deductive approaches for focused research questions to quickly share findings and inform practice. We encourage other researchers to adopt and adapt our protocol, in conjunction with reporting frameworks such as PARRQA, to continue to advance the field on timely deductive qualitative analysis approaches.

Keywords: Qualitative methods, Rapid analysis, Protocol

References

Balas, E., & Boren, S. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems (pp. 65–70). Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Balis, L. E., Swindle, T. M., Palmer, S., Shaw, E., Dozier, S. J., & Dewey, M. G. (2025). Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities Matching Process ( ISAC Match ): Expanded Guidance and Case Study. Implement Sci. 20(43).
Balis, L., Houghtaling, B., Clausen, W., Lane, H., Wende, M., Pereira, E., McLoughlin, G., & Harden, S. (2024). Advancing Implementation Science in Community Settings: The Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities (ISAC) Compilation. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21(1), 132.
Balis, L., Palmer, S., Isack, M., & Yaroch, A. (2025). Barriers and Facilitators to Program Evaluation and Dissemination: A Qualitative Study to Inform Implementation Strategies. Health Promotion Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251362163
Balis, L., Stott, G., Palmer, S., & Brucker, D. (2025). Active Transportation Practices and Preferences Among People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Study. Discover Public Health, 22.
Barnard, J. G., Young, J., Mog, A. C., Stevenson, L. D., George, G., Ball, S. L., Lee, M., Stryczek, K. C., & Fehling, K. (2025). The Guided Team Discussion: A Standardized Process and Approach for Team-based Reflection and Management in Early Stages of Qualitative Data Collection. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15891
Brown, R., Kennedy, S. C., Chávez, E. C., Rodriguez, J. D., & Cullen, D. (2025). Evaluation of a notes ‑ based rapid qualitative analysis method to facilitate implementation. Implementation Science Communications. 6(23).
Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2021). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020979329
Cutcliffe, J., & McKenna, H. (2004). Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(2), 126–133.
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
Davis, M., & Beidas, R. S. (2021). Refining contextual inquiry to maximize generalizability and accelerate the implementation process. Implementation Research and Practice. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489521994941
Domlyn, A. M., Dodge, J., Pfeiffer, P. N., Robinson, C. H., Evans, L., Damschroder, L. J., Stewart, M. A., Garlick, B., Sussman, J. B., & Nevedal, A. L. (2026). Evaluating the utility of an abbreviated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research ( CFIR ) for rapid qualitative analysis : a suicide prevention program case study. Implementation Science Communications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058026009565.
Finley, E., Hamilton, A., & Kowalski, C. Midboe, A., Nevedal, A., & Young, J. (2022). Rapid Qualitative Methods in Implementation Science: Techniques and Considerations. 15^th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health, Washington, DC.
Fung Uy, W., Balis, L., & Nelson, K. (2026). Specialty Crop Impacts on the Environment and Health in the US Midwest: A Qualitative Study Guided by the RE-AIM Framework. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 1–26.
Gale, R. C., Wu, J., Erhardt, T., Bounthavong, M., Reardon, C. M., Damschroder, L. J., & Midboe, A. M. (2019). Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implementation Science. 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Frontiers in Public Health. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Hamilton, A. (2013). Qualitative methods in rapid turn-around health services research, VA Women’s Health Research Network. Retrieved from: http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/video_archive.cfm?SessionID=780
Hamilton, A., & Finley, E. (2024). Saturation in qualitative methods: Considerations for implementation research. UCLA 3R Implementation Science Hub Methods Workshop.
Hamilton, A., & Finley, E. (2019). Qualitative Methods in Implementation Research: An Introduction. Psychiatry Research. 280.
Khan, S., Chambers, D., & Neta, G. (2021). Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. Cancer Causes and Control. 32, 221–230.
Kowalski, C. P., Nevedal, A. L., Finley, E. P., Young, J. P., Lewinski, A. A., Midboe, A. M., & Hamilton, A. B. (2024). Planning for and Assessing Rigor in Rapid Qualitative Analysis (PARRQA): a consensus-based framework for designing, conducting, and reporting. Implementation Science. 19(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01397-1
Le, P. D., Eschliman, E. L., Grivel, M. M., Tang, J., Cho, Y. G., Yang, X., Tay, C., Li, T., Bass, J., & Yang, L. H. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle- income countries : a systematic review using implementation science frameworks. Implementation Science. 17(4).
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Malterud, K., Siersma, V., & Guassora, A. (2015). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research. 26(13).
Means, A. R., Kemp, C. G., Gimbel, S., Soi, C., Sherr, K., Wagenaar, B. H., Wasserheit, J. N., & Weiner, B. J. (2020). Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research ( CFIR ) for use in low- and middle-income countries : a systematic review. Implementation Science. 15(17).
Nevedal, A. L., Reardon, C. M., Opra Widerquist, M. A., Jackson, G. L., Cutrona, S. L., White, B. S., & Damschroder, L. J. (2021). Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation Science, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5
Nilsen, P., Kislov, R., Birken, S. A., & Mittman, B. S. (2026). Too deductive too soon ? Toward an inductive renewal of implementation science. Implementation Science. 21(31).
Ojo, T., Kabasele, L., Boyd, B., Enechukwu, S., Ryan, N., Gyamfi, J., & Peprah, E. (2021). The Role of Implementation Science in Advancing Resource Generation for Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Health Serv Insights. 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632921999652
Palmer, S., Balis, L. E., & Yaroch, A. L. (2026). Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Shipped Medically Tailored Meal Pilot Intervention. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 13(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2175
Palmer, S., Balis, L., Shaw, E., & Yaroch, A. (2025). Multi Methods Assessment of Technical Assistance for Community-Based Food Access Organizations. Health Promotion Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251363961
Peek, C. J., Glasgow, R. E., Stange, K. C., Klesges, L. M., Peyton Purcell, E., & Kessler, R. S. (2014). The 5 r’s: An emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world. Annals of Family Medicine. 12(5), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1688
Robinson, O. C., & Bailey-Rodriguez, D. (2025). Deductive qualitative research: an integrative approach to designing studies. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 23(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2025.2604773
Sivaram, S., Sanchez, M., Rimer, B., Samet, J., & Glasgow, R. (2014). Implementation Science in Cancer Prevention and Control: A framework for research and programs in low and middle-income countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 23(11), 2273–2284.
Strifler, L., Cardoso, R., Mcgowan, J., Cogo, E., Nincic, V., Khan, P. A., Scott, A., Ghassemi, M., Macdonald, H., Lai, Y., Treister, V., Tricco, A. C., & Straus, S. E. (2018). Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories , models , and frameworks with limited use. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 100, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008
Taylor, B., Henshall, C., Kenyon, S., Litchfield, I., & Greenfield, S. (2018). Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open. 8(10), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 19(6), 349–357.

Citation

Palmer, S., & Balis, L. (2026). Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

Palmer, S., and Balis, L. (2026). Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(3), pp. 372-385. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

Palmer S, Balis L. Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

Palmer, Shelly, and Laura Balis. "Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2026 10 no. 3 (2026): 372-385. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

Palmer, Shelly et al. "Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 3, 2026, pp. 372-385. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192

Palmer S, Balis L. Rapid Deductive Qualitative Analysis in Implementation Science: A Practical Training Protocol. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(3):372-85. https://doi.org/10.66815/ajqr/19192