Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis

Jessica Cassidy; Kathy Siepker; Jen Hirsch; Alisha Thompson; Jaci Mitchell

doi:10.29333/ajqr/16542

Jessica Cassidy ¹ ^* , Kathy Siepker ², Jen Hirsch ³, Alisha Thompson ⁴, Jaci Mitchell ⁵

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp. 182-203

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

OPEN ACCESS 71 Views 45 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The theory of biophilia hypothesizes humans have an instinctual desire to interact with nature that benefits physical and cognitive development, as well as health and well-being. This study aimed to explore how the theory of biophilia was represented across urban older adults’ descriptions of their experiences in and perceptions of nature. We analyzed secondary qualitative data from focus groups with community-dwelling, urban older adults. Using directed content analysis, we developed a categorization matrix and a priori codes derived from concepts and mechanisms outlined in the theory of biophilia. Two coders then independently coded the data and reached a consensus. The team then worked iteratively to identify categories and sub-categories. All participants were female (N =30), and the majority were African Americans or Black (83.3%). We identified five broad categories: 1) Cognitive Aspects of Nature, 2) Nature Influences Multiple Domains of Well-being, 3) Nature as a Platform for Shared Experiences and Social Connectedness, 4) Greater Nature Appreciation in Later Stages of Life, and 5) Barriers to Enjoying Nature. Overall, we observed that participants valued their interactions with nature and, as a result, experienced elevated feelings of well-being. Many participants explained how their appreciation for nature interactions intensified in later life, suggesting nature-based activities may be a useful approach to promoting the health and well-being of older adults.

Keywords: Biophilia, non-pharmacological interventions, ecotherapy, gerontology, horticultural therapy

References

Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.12.1389
Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto- and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in. Psychology, 12, Article 700709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709
Baxter, D. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2019). Is nature relatedness a basic human psychological need? A critical examination of the extant literature. Canadian Psychology = Psychologie Canadienne, 60(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000145
Berman, M. G., Cardenas-Iniguez, C., & Meidenbauer, K. L. (2021). An environmental neuroscience perspective on the benefits of nature. In A. R.Schutte, J. C. Torquati, & J. R. Stevens (Eds.), Nature and psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 67, pp. 61–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69020-5_4
Berto, R., Barbiero, G., Barbiero, P., & Senes, G. (2018). An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments: Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences, 8(3), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8030034
Browning, M. H. E. M., Mimnaugh, K. J., van Riper, C. J., Laurent, H. K., & LaValle, S. M. (2020). Can simulated nature support mental health? Comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667
Boffi, M., Pola, L., Fumagalli, N., Fermani, E., Senes, G., & Inghilleri, P. (2021). Nature experiences of older people for active ageing: An interdisciplinary approach to the co-design of community gardens. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 702525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702525
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
Cartwright, B. D., White, M. P., & Clitherow, T. J. (2018). Nearby nature ‘buffers’ the effect of low social connectedness on adult subjective wellbeing over the last 7 days. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), Article 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061238
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
Dankiw, K. A., Tsiros, M. D., Baldock, K. L., & Kumar, S. (2020). The impacts of unstructured nature play on health in early childhood development: A systematic review. PLOS One, 15(2), Article e0229006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229006
Detweiler, M. B., Sharma, T., Detweiler, J. G., Murphy, P. F., Lane, S., Carman, J., Chudhary, A. S., Halling, M. H., & Kim, K. Y. (2012). What is the evidence to support the use of therapeutic gardens for the elderly? Psychiatry Investigation, 9(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.4306%2Fpi.2012.9.2.100
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
Edwards, N. E., & Beck, A. M. (2013). The influence of aquariums on weight in individuals with dementia. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 27(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182769b34
Estok, S. C. (2010). Narrativizing science: The ecocritical imagination and ecophobia. Configurations, 18(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2010.0002
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2015). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2018–2034. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv020
Finlay, J., Franke, T., McKay, H., & Sims-Gould, J. (2015). Therapeutic landscapes and well-being in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health & Place, 34, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001
Freeman, C., Waters, D. L., Buttery, Y., & van Heezik, Y. (2019). The impacts of ageing on connection to nature: The varied responses of older adults. Health & Place, 56, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.010
Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L.,& Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), Article 075001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
Gaekwad, J. S., Sal Moslehian, A., Roös, P. B., & Walker, A. (2022). A meta-analysis of emotional evidence for the biophilia hypothesis and implications for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 750245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245
Gagliardi, C., & Piccinini, F. (2019). The use of nature–based activities for the well-being of older people: An integrative literature review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 83, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.012
Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Seduikyte, L., Teixeira-Gomes, A., Mendes, A., Borodinecs, A., & Buzinskaite, D. (2020). Aging, living environment, and sustainability: What should be taken into account? Sustainability, 12(5), Article 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051853
Griffin, R., & Elkins, K. (2013). Bird tales. Program guide. National Audubon Society.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Gunnarsson, B., & Hedblom, M. (2023). Biophilia revisited: Nature versus nurture. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(9), 792–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.06.002
Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundström, J. N. (2019). Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 10113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7
Heinsch, M. (2012). Getting down to earth: Finding a place for nature in social work practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00860.x
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hu, M., & Roberts, J. D. (2020). Connections and divergence between public health and built environment: A scoping review. Urban Science, 4(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4010012
Hughes, J., Rogerson, M., Barton, J., & Bragg, R. (2019). Age and connection to nature: When is engagement critical? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(5), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2035
Hurly, J., & Walker, G. J. (2019). Nature in our lives: Examining the human need for nature relatedness as a basic psychological need. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(4), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1578939
Jiao, L., & Luo, L. (2022). Dispositional awe positively predicts prosocial tendencies: The multiple mediation effects of connectedness and empathy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416605
Joye, Y., & De Block, A. (2011). ‘Nature and I are two’: A critical examination of thebiophilia hypothesis. Environmental Values, 20(2), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X12997574391724
Kellert, S., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. www.biophilic-design.com
Kerishnan, P. B., & Maruthaveeran, S. (2021). Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks: A review of the evidence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, Article 126985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126985
Kobayashi, H., Song, C., Ikei, H., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2015). Analysis of individual variations in autonomic responses to urban and forest environments. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015(1), Article 671094. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/671094
Kragh, G., Stafford, R., Curtin, S., & Diaz, A. (2016). Environmental volunteer well-being: Managers’ perception and actual well-being of volunteers. F1000 Research, 5, Article 2679. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10016.1
Lee, K., Cassidy, J., Tang, W., & Kusek, V. (2022). Older adults’ responses to a meaningful activity using indoor-based nature experiences: Bird tales. Clinical Gerontologist, 45(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2020.1808869
Levin, L., & Nevo, M. (2024). Person, people, planet: Eco-systematic analysis of older adults’ experiences of engagement with nature and discourse about nature. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 67(4), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2024.2339973
Lien, L. L., Steggell, C. D., & Iwarsson, S. (2015). Adaptive strategies and person-environment fit among functionally limited older adults aging in place: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(9), 11954–11974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911954
Lopes, S., Lima, M., & Silva, K. (2020). Nature can get it out of your mind: The rumination reducing effects of contact with nature and the mediating role of awe and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, Article 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101489
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Levy-Storms, L., Chen, L., & Brozen, M. (2016). Parks for an aging population: Needs and preferences of low-income seniors in Los Angeles. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1163238
Mei, D., Yang, D., Li, T., Zhang, X., Rao, K., & Li, L. M. W. (2024). Nature contact promotes prosociality: The mediating roles of self-transcendence, nature connectedness, and materialism, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, Article 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102324
Monroy, M., & Keltner, D. (2023). Awe as a pathway to mental and physical health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221094856
Office of the Surgeon General. (2023). Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation: The U.S. surgeon general’s advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK595227/
Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman, A. J. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion–cognition interactions: Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00058
Orban, E., Sutcliffe, R., Dragano, N., Jöckel, K.-H., & Moebus, S. (2017). Residential surrounding greenness, self-rated health and interrelations with aspects of neighborhood environment and social relations. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0112-3
Orr, N., Wagstaffe, A., Briscoe, S., & Garside, R. (2016). How do older people describe their sensory experiences of the natural world? A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMC Geriatrics, 16, Article 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0288-0
Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2014). Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.08.004
Pessoa, L. (2022). The entangled brain: How perception, cognition, and emotion are woven together. MIT Press.
Pruessner, L., Barnow, S., Holt, D. V., Joormann, J., & Schulze, K. (2020). A cognitive control framework for understanding emotion regulation flexibility. Emotion, 20(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000658
Pyle, R. M. (1993). The thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland. Houghton Mifflin.
Saldaña, J. (2013). Coding manual for qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sia, A., Tam, W. W., Fogel, A., Kua, E. H., Khoo, K., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Nature-based activities improve the well-being of older adults. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 18178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74828-w
Thomas, E., & Magilvy, J. K. (2011). Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x
van Houwelingen-Snippe, J., Allouch, S. B., & van Rompay, T. J. (2023). ‘That is a place where I would want to go’: Investigating digital nature to enhance social wellbeing among older adults. Ageing & Society, 43(11), 2605–2628. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2100177X
Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.16.1.0001
Wen, C., Albert, C., & von Haaren, C. (2022). Nature-based recreation for the elderly in urban areas: Assessing opportunities and demand as planning support. Ecological Processes, 11(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-022-00390-0
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231
Wojciehowski, M., & Ernst, J. (2018). Creative by nature: Investigating the impact of nature preschools on young children’s creative thinking. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(1), 3–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1193490.pdf

Citation

Cassidy, J., Siepker, K., Hirsch, J., Thompson, A., & Mitchell, J. (2025). Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

Cassidy, J., Siepker, K., Hirsch, J., Thompson, A., and Mitchell, J. (2025). Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(3), pp. 182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

Cassidy J, Siepker K, Hirsch J, Thompson A, Mitchell J. Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2025;9(3), 182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

Cassidy, Jessica, Kathy Siepker, Jen Hirsch, Alisha Thompson, and Jaci Mitchell. "Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2025 9 no. 3 (2025): 182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

Cassidy, Jessica et al. "Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2025, pp. 182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542

Cassidy J, Siepker K, Hirsch J, Thompson A, Mitchell J. Urban Older Adults’ Perspectives on Nature: A Directed Content Analysis. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2025;9(3):182-203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16542