Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education

Robert Todd  Kane; Jolyn Dahlvig

doi:10.29333/ajqr/12125

Robert Todd Kane ¹ ^* , Jolyn Dahlvig ¹

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 1-16

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

OPEN ACCESS 1526 Views 1990 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Research has shown that traditional faculty are resistant to online higher education, expressing concerns about the quality of the learning experience, a lack of administrator transparency, and the amount of time faculty spend to convert their classes to an online format (Community College of Aurora, n.d.; Green & Wagner, 2011; Paris, 2011. In fact, only 9% of faculty in a 2017 study indicated that they would prefer to teach in an online setting (Pomerantz & Brooks, 2017). The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of faculty to increase faculty acceptance of online education. This study was conducted at a unique time during which the university had forced all courses to go online due to the Coronavirus pandemic. Based on the study, traditional faculty see online education as a viable means of delivering an education to students in theory. However, due to a lack of transparency from administration, concerns about over the time commitment to build a quality online program, their perceptions of what the institution values and recognizes, and the incentives for traditional faculty, they do not believe online learning at the institution studied is appropriate.

Keywords: online education, eLearning, collaboration, course design, hybrid learning, traditional education, student engagement.

References

Archibald, C. (2017). Reflection: Lessons learned from teaching online in undergraduate programs. ABNF Journal, 28(4), 114-118.
Arenas-Gaitan, J., Rondan-Cataluna, J., & Ramirez-Correa, P. E. (2010). Gender influence in perception and adoption of e-learning platforms. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2010/Faro/DNCOCO/DNCOCO-04.pdf
Baltaru, R., & Soysal, Y. (2017). Administrators in higher education: Organizational expansion in a transforming institution. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320986783_Administrators_in_higher_education_organizational_expansion_in_a_transforming_institution
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2/
Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change (3rd ed.). DaCapo Press.
Brooks, C., & Pomerantz, J. (2017). ECAR Study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/10/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2017
Burke, L. (2020). Colleges end in-person instruction early due to COVID-19 spread. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/11/17/colleges-end-person-instruction-early-due-covid-19-spread
Community College of Aurora. (n.d.). Benefits of online education. https://www.ccaurora.edu/programs-classes/online-learning/benefits-online-education
Dahlvig, J. (2017). Leading for the common good: Positive leadership for change.
Erstad, W. (2017). Online vs. traditional education: What you need to know. https://www.rasmussen.edu/student-experience/college-life/online-vs-traditional-education-answer-never-expected/
Fain, P. (2019). Takedown of online education. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/01/16/online-learning-fails-deliver-finds-report-aimed-discouraging
Flowers, J., & Baltzer, H. (2006). Hiring technical education faculty: Vacancies, criteria, and attitudes toward online doctoral degrees. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v43n3/pdf/flowers.pdf
Gallagher, S., & Palmer, J. (2020). The pandemic pushed universities online. The change was long overdue. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/09/the-pandemic-pushed-universities-online-the-change-was-long-overdue
Green, K. C., & Wagner, E. (2011). Online education: Where is it going? What should boards know? https://www.agb.org/trusteeship/2011/januaryfebruary/online-education-where-is-it-going-what-should-boards-know
Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. Routledge.
Khalil, S. M. (2013). From resistance to acceptance and use of technology in academia. Open Praxis, 5(2), 151-163.
Kotter, J. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1995/05/leading-change-why-transformation-efforts-fail-2
Kotter, J. (2014). Accelerate: Building strategic agility for a faster-moving world. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/04/accelerate-building-strategic-agility-for-a-faster-moving-world
Kotter, J., & Schlesinger, L. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2008/07/choosing-strategies-for-change
Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M., & McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-12. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no1/lloyd_0312.pdf
NCES. (2020). Distance learning statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
Online Learning Consortium. (2014). 2014 survey of online learning grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/survey-reports-2014
Online Learning Consortium. (2017). The Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/digital-learning-compass-distance-education-enrollment-report-2017/
Open Education Database. (2018). 7 Advantages to taking online classes: OEDb. https://oedb.org/ilibrarian/10-advantages-to-taking-online-classes/
Paris, D. (2011). The last artisans? Traditional and future faculty roles. https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/last-artisans-traditional-and-future-faculty-roles
Saldana, J. (2008). Codes and coding. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/24614_01_Saldana_Ch_01.pdf
Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228708239_Strategies_for_Ensuring_Trustworthiness_in_Qualitative_Research_Projects
Sibley, K., & Whitaker, R. (2015). Engaging faculty in online education. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/3/engaging-faculty-in-online-education
Ubell, R. (2020). How online education went from teaching reform to economic necessity for colleges. EdSurge News. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-03-05-how-online-education-went-from-teaching-reform-to-economic-necessity-for-colleges
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Citation

Kane, R. T., & Dahlvig, J. (2022). Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

Kane, R. T., and Dahlvig, J. (2022). Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(2), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

Kane RT, Dahlvig J. Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

Kane, Robert Todd, and Jolyn Dahlvig. "Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2022 6 no. 2 (2022): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

Kane, Robert Todd et al. "Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125

Kane RT, Dahlvig J. Traditional Faculty Resistance to Online Higher Education. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12125