The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine

R. Thomas Collins II; Stephen Roth; Meenu Singh; Rania Sanford

doi:10.29333/ajqr/16533

R. Thomas Collins II ¹ ^* , Stephen Roth ², Meenu Singh ³, Rania Sanford ²

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp. 47-60

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

OPEN ACCESS 45 Views 30 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Academic medical centers are investing heavily in physician career development to foster career satisfaction and success. Though studies in numerous other professions have identified serendipity as a major contributor to success, its role in physician career success is unknown. We conducted 40 semi-structured, 50-minute interviews of physicians who had achieved the rank of full professor in our school of medicine. We used inductive content analysis to identify content categories, with serendipity emerging as one such category. In this study, we performed a secondary analysis to identify if and how participants discussed serendipity in relation to success in academic medicine. Following identification of subcategories related to serendipity, we conducted a secondary inductive content analysis revealing themes that were synthesized into a new theory of serendipity. Twenty-nine participants spontaneously described as serendipitous various circumstances important to their professional success and comprised the present study cohort. Four major themes emerged and revealed serendipitous events occurred when a participant was either 1) prepared for, 2) in right position for, and/or 3) promoted for an opportunity that they took the personal initiative to seize. These findings form a new theory of serendipity. Our group of academic physicians identified serendipity—the intersection of preparation and opportunity—as a significant contributor to career advancement. Our theory of serendipity suggests it is possible to “create your own luck.” These findings have important implications for physician career development.

Keywords: Physician, faculty development, career, luck

References

Andel, P. (1992). Serendipity: “Expect also the unexpected.” Creativity and Innovation Management, 1(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.1992.tb00018.x
Andel, P. V. (1994). Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(2), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.2.631
Arfini, S., Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2020). The antinomies of serendipity how to cognitively frame serendipity for scientific discoveries. Topoi, 39(4), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9571-3
Ayyala, M. S., Skarupski, K., Bodurtha, J. N., González-Fernández, M., Ishii, L. E., Fivush, B., & Levine, R. B. (2019). Mentorship is not enough. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002398
Betsworth, D. G., & Hansen, J.-I. C. (1996). The categorization of serendipitous career development events. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400106
Bland, C. J. (1995). Rethinking faculty development. Academic Medicine, 70(11), 945-946 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199511000-00001
Bland, C. J., Schmitz, C. C., Stritter, F. T., Aluise, J. A., & Henry, R. C. (1988). Project to identify essential faculty skills and develop model curricula for faculty development programs. Journal of Medical Education, 63(6), 467–469. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198806000-00007
Bland, C. J., & Stritter, F. T. (1988). Characteristics of effective family medicine faculty development programs. Family Medicine, 20(4), 282–288. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3203836/
Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., & Harpham, L. (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001
Campanario, J. M. (1996). Using Citation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery. Scientometrics, 37(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02093482
Childs, E., Remein, C. D., Bhasin, R. M., Harris, A. C., Day, A., Sullivan, L. M., Coleman, D. L., & Benjamin, E. J. (2021). How to launch and continually enhance an effective medical campus faculty development program: Steps for implementation and lessons learned. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s308608
Chumaceiro, C. L. D. de. (2004). Serendipity and pseudoserendipity in career paths of successful women: Orchestra conductors. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2004.9651464
Cochran, A., Elder, W. B., & Neumayer, L. A. (2019). Characteristics of effective mentorship for academic surgeons. Annals of Surgery, 269(2), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002487
Copeland, S. (2019). On serendipity in science: Discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom. Synthese, 196(6), 2385–2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1544-3
de Rond, M. (2014). The structure of serendipity. Culture and Organization, 20(5), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.967451
Fine, G. A., & Deegan, J. G. (1996). Three principles of Serendip: Insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090405
Friedel, R. (2001). Serendipity is no accident. The Kenyon Review, 23(2), 36–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4338198
Gal, J. (2008). The discovery of biological enantioselectivity: Louis Pasteur and the fermentation of tartaric acid, 1857—A review and analysis 150 yr later. Chirality, 20(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.20494
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative success. Transaction Publishers.
Hackworth, J. M., Meinzen-Derr, J., DePalma, M., Hostetter, M., Klein, M., O’Toole, J. K., & Kahn, J. (2021). The impact of primary mentors and career development committees on junior faculty productivity in a pediatric academic health center. The Journal of Pediatrics, 232, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.037
Hart, D. H., Rayner, K., & Christensen, E. R. (1971). Planning, preparation, and chance in occupational entry. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(71)90029-7
Henderson, J. W. (1997). The yellow brick road to penicillin: A story of serendipity. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 72, 683–687.
Hu, W. C. Y., Thistlethwaite, J. E., Weller, J., Gallego, G., Monteith, J., & McColl, G. J. (2015). ‘It was serendipity’: A qualitative study of academic careers in medical education. Medical Education, 49(11), 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12822
Jackson, V. A., Palepu, A., Szalacha, L., Caswell, C., Carr, P. L., & Inui, T. (2003). “Having the right chemistry”: A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(3), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200303000-00020
Kashiwagi, D. T., Varkey, P., & Cook, D. A. (2013). Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 88(7), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318294f368
Levine, R. B., Ayyala, M. S., Skarupski, K. A., Bodurtha, J. N., Fernández, M. G., Ishii, L. E., & Fivush, B. (2021). “It’s a little different for men”—Sponsorship and gender in academic medicine: A qualitative study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05956-2
McCay‐Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23273
Merton, R., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity. Princeton University Press.
Mirvahedi, S., & Morrish, S. (2017). The role of serendipity in opportunity exploration. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrme-10-2017-0045
Mitchell, K. E., Levin, A. S., & Krumboltz, J. D. (1999). Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6675.1999.tb02431.x
Morrison, L. J., Lorens, E., Bandiera, G., Liles, W. C., Lee, L., Hyland, R., Mcdonald-Blumer, H., Allard, J. P., Panisko, D. M., Heathcote, E. J., & Levinson, W. (2014). Impact of a formal mentoring program on academic promotion of department of medicine faculty: A comparative study. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.899683
Napolitano, C. M. (2013). More than just a simple twist of fate: Serendipitous relations in developmental science. Human Development, 56(5), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355022
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Pololi, L. H., Knight, S. M., Dennis, K., & Frankel, R. M. (2002). Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams. Academic Medicine, 77(5), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00005
Rojewski, J. W. (1999). The role of chance in the career development of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511261
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marusic, A. (2006). Mentoring in academic medicine: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(9), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1103
Sandi, G., & Chubinskaya, S. (2020). A faculty development model that promotes success of early career faculty in academic medicine. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 40(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000282
Seehusen, D. A., Rogers, T. S., Achkar, M. A., & Chang, T. (2021). Coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring as career development tools. Family Medicine, 53(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2021.341047
Singh, S., & Estefan, A. (2018). Selecting a grounded theory approach for nursing research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 5, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393618799571
Thorndyke, L. E., Gusic, M. E., George, J. H., Quillen, D. A., & Milner, R. J. (2006). Empowering junior faculty: Penn State’s faculty development and mentoring program. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.acm.0000232424.88922.df
Travis, E. L., Doty, L., & Helitzer, D. L. (2013). Sponsorship. Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1414–1417. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182a35456
Tung, J., Nahid, M., Rajan, M., & Logio, L. (2021). The impact of a faculty development program, the Leadership in Academic Medicine Program (LAMP), on self-efficacy, academic promotion and institutional retention. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02899-y
Vears, D. F., & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 23(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544
Williams, E. N., Soeprapto, E., Like, K., Touradji, P., Hess, S., & Hill, C. E. (1998). Perceptions of serendipity: Career paths of prominent academic women in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.379

Citation

Collins II, R. T., Roth, S., Singh, M., & Sanford, R. (2025). The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

Collins II, R. T., Roth, S., Singh, M., and Sanford, R. (2025). The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(3), pp. 47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

Collins II RT, Roth S, Singh M, Sanford R. The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2025;9(3), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

Collins II, R. Thomas, Stephen Roth, Meenu Singh, and Rania Sanford. "The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2025 9 no. 3 (2025): 47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

Collins II, R. Thomas et al. "The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2025, pp. 47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533

Collins II RT, Roth S, Singh M, Sanford R. The Nature of Serendipity and Its Effect on Success in Academic Medicine. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2025;9(3):47-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16533