Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses

Lauren Dudley

doi:10.29333/ajqr/17418

Lauren Dudley ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 109-122

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

OPEN ACCESS 50 Views 33 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Chemistry is the foundational course for any science major, as well as many post-baccalaureate programs. However, chemistry courses in higher education are considered highly impacted and continue to have high failure rates every semester. Current research in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education identifies those students struggle due to their reliance on memorization to understand foundational concepts. Not much is known about what successful students have experienced, the development of their STEM identity, or their methods of studying. The present qualitative study explores how four successful students negotiated key bonding concepts in general chemistry and how these experiences shaped their STEM identity and self‑efficacy during the COVID‑19 era of online learning. Semi‑structured interviews were analyzed thematically using grounded theory, with member checking, triangulation of artefacts, and an audit trail to enhance trustworthiness. Three major themes emerged: (a) positive experiences that sparked engagement, (b) strategic independence that bolstered confidence, and (c) instructional strategies (visualization, depth of explanation, authentic problems) that students found most helpful. Implications for equity‑oriented pedagogy and universal design for learning (UDL) in chemistry are discussed.

Keywords: Chemistry, student perceptions, influences, positive experiences

References

Akojie, P., Entrekin, F., Bacon, D., & Kanai, T. (2019). Qualitative meta-data analysis: Perceptions and experiences of online doctoral students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5814
American Chemical Society. (2022). Inclusion and belonging in chemistry. https://www.acs.org/about/inclusion.html
Ainscough, L., Foulis, E., Macaulay, J. O., Zimbardi, K., & Colthorpe, K. (2016). Changes in biology self-efficacy during a first-year university course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(19), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0092
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through Universal Design for Learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500401
Bong, M. (1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concept. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.102
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Chen, X., Soldner, M., & Wang, C. (2021). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2021-014). National Center for Education Statistics.
Cheung, C. (2014). Analysis, evaluation, and reformulation of social cognitive theory. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9415-0
Cooper, M. M., & Stowe, R. (2022). Equity-centered chemistry education research: A call for critical perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1234–1242.
Dogutas, A. (2020). Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559
Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., & MacDougall, M. (1994). Reflective self-efficacy: A path model for training outcomes. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(2), 23–33.
Ferguson, J., & Martin, D. (2022). Metacognitive training boosts confidence and achievement in first-year chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(4), 1032–1047.
Fovet, F., Mynott, G., & Burke, J. (2010). UDL and inclusive practice in post-secondary education: Implications for institutional policy and practice. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 23(3), 248–262.
Galyon, C. E., Blair, C. L., Baildon, M., & Pallett, J. (2011). Academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and academic performance in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 159–173.
Gibbons, R. E., & Raker, J. R. (2019). Self-efficacy and self-concept in organic chemistry: A reciprocal causation, cross-lagged model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 739–762.
Hall, E., & Shaw, K. (2022). Student engagement in fully online chemistry laboratories during COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(8), 2801–2810.
Houdyshell, M., & Kirk, P. (2018). Graduate students’ perceptions’ on a professional pathway for academic advisors. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5795
Kokka, K. (2018). Critical pedagogy: Reflections on universal design and cultural relevance in STEM classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 26.
Kim, A. Y., & Sinatra, G. M. (2018). Science identity: An interactionist perspective. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 51.
Kim, A. Y., Smith, C., & Taylor, J. (2023). Gender differences in study-space preferences for introductory chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1879–1888.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623–636.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Moon, N. W., Utschig, T. T., Todd, R. L., & Bozzorg, A. (2011). Universal design in postsecondary STEM education: Charting the landscape. Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access.
Morales-Doyle, D. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: Exploring new possibilities for chemistry education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 295–317.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educators. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26215
National Science Foundation. (2023). NSB Vision 2030: Embracing the future of STEM. National Science Board.
Pawlak, K., & Barbera, J. (2024). Investigating evidence of validity and reliability for the Meaningful Learning in the Laboratory Instrument (MLLI). Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00121K
Platt, C., Goates-Jones, M., Maile Cutri, R., Fidalgo Wheeler, L., & Walden, T. (2022). Interrupted systems mitigating social gender roles: A qualitative inquiry of motherscholars during a pandemic. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 153-177. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11645
Raker, J. R., Royer, C. E., & Stowe, R. (2023). Attrition in general and organic chemistry: Factors reported by marginalized students. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(6), 2654–2662.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.
Stewart, L. (2022). STEM identity formation in undergraduate chemistry majors: A longitudinal qualitative study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(5), 1221–1239.
Towns, M. H., & Cole, R. (2023). General and organic chemistry as “gatekeeper” courses: A systematic review of failure and withdrawal data. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(1), 15–27.
Van Dinther, M., Docherty, P., Masereeuw, J., & Segers, M. (2011). Student perceptions of teacher feedback and self-efficacy in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 174–195.

Citation

Dudley, L. (2026). Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

Dudley, L. (2026). Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(1), pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

Dudley L. Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

Dudley, Lauren. "Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2026 10 no. 1 (2026): 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

Dudley, Lauren "Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2026, pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418

Dudley L. Perceptions of Student Success in Post-Secondary Chemistry Courses. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2026;10(1):109-22. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17418