Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students

Aysun Dogutas

doi:10.29333/ajqr/8559

Aysun Dogutas ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp. 83-91

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

OPEN ACCESS 2821 Views 1838 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Culture is essential because culture is the root of society. Thus, transferring the culture to the new generations is important. This study aims to find out how effective families and schools are with enculturation in Turkey. The primary objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of families and schools on enculturation; other aims of the study were to determine 1) the effectiveness of enculturation on secondary school students in Turkey, and 2) the knowledge and perception of students on cultural objects. This study used semi-structured interviews to acquire data. According to the semi-structured interviews, eight main themes emerged. These themes were as follows; cultural elements, holiday visits, handicrafts, cultural trips with teachers, cultural trips with family, an analogy of enculturation, the importance of culture, and presentation of cultural elements to tourists.

Keywords: Culture, Enculturation, Social Sciences Course, Society, Turkey.

References

Aykaç, N. (2007). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi eğitim- öğretim programına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views regarding the primary education social studies course education-training program]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(22), 46-73. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6136/82315
Baki, Y. (2019). Ortaokul Türkçe ders kitaplarındaki metinlerin değer aktarımı açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of secondary school Turkish textbooks in terms of value transmission]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 17(37), 109-146. https://doi.org/10.34234/ded.460042
Berkay, F. (1990). 20. Yüzyıl'da sosyal değişme ve milli kültür varlığımız. 2. milli kültür surası bildirileri [Social change and our national cultural presence in the 20th Century]. Proceedings of the 2nd National Cultural Council, Vol 1. (pp. 44-46). TC. Ministry of Culture Publications.
Berray, M. (2019). A critical literary review of the Melting Pot and Salad Bowl Assimilation and integration theories. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 6(1), 142-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/217
Celkan, Y. H. (2005). 21. Yüzyıl'da sosyoloji ve eğitim [Sociology and education in the 21st century]. In A. Solak (Ed.), Küreselleşme ve toplum [Globalization and society]. Hegem Yayınları.
Darchininan, F., & Magnan, M. O. (2020). Boundaries Through the Prism of Post-secondary and Professional Orientation: The Views of Young Québec Adults of Immigrant Background. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 50-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/326
Erkal, M. (2006). Sosyoloji [Sociology]. Der Yayınları.
Gürel, D. (2018). Somut olmayan kültürel miras etkinliklerinin 7. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde kullanımı [The use of intangible cultural heritage activities in 7th grade social studies lesson] [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University Educational Sciences Institute]. Ankara.
Güvenç, B. (1997). Kültürün abc'si [ABC of culture]. Yapı Kredi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
Haviland, W. A. (2002). Kültürel Antropoloji [Cultural Anthropology]. Kaktüs Yayınları.
Kula, F. (2017). Kültür aktarımı ve kültürel kimliğin geliştirilmesi konusunda yöneticilerin, öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin ve velilerin beklentileri, görüşleri ve onerileri [Expectations, opinions and suggestions of administrators, teachers, students and parents on cultural transfer and development of cultural identity] [Master’s thesis, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya].
Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative research: A guide to pattern and practice]. (S. Turan Trans.). Nobel Yayın.
Mora, N. (2008). Medya ve kültürel kimlik [Media and cultural identity] Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1-14. https://docplayer.biz.tr/3252207-Medya-ve-kulturel-kimlik.html
Özgüleç, İ. (2007). Milli kültür perspektifinden eğitim [Education from the perspective of national culture]. İndeks Yayınevi.
Özyurt, C. (2008). Küreselleşme, ulusal eğitim ve siyasal toplumsallaşma [Globalisation, national education and political socialisation]. In M. Safran & D. Dilek (Eds.), Identity, citizenship and history education in the 21st century. New Human Publications.
Papadopoulou, V., Theodosiadou, K., & Palaiologou, N. (2020). Teachers' Personal Theories of Teaching: Managing Cultural Diversity in Mainstream Public Primary Schools in Greece. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 195-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/375
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative research and evaluation methods]. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans). Pegem Akademi.
Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. SAGE Publications.
Seidman, R. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
Selanik Ay, T., & Güllü, S. (2020). National holiday ceremonies from past to today in the context of social studies course: An ethnographic research. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 145-168.
Sertkaya, B. (2010). İlköğretim II. kademe sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretiminde kültür aktarımı ve kültürel kimlik geliştirme [Cultural transfer and cultural identity development in primary II. gradual social studies course teaching] [Master’s thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü]. Balıkesir.
Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
State Planning Organization. (2006). 9th Development Plan (2007–2013). Ankara.
Ünal, F., Gürel, D., & Er, H. (2019). Kırsal alanda yaşayanların somut olmayan kültürel miras aktarımınına ilişkin bir inceleme: Bartın örneğ [An investigation on the transference of intangible cultural heritage of the living in rural area: Bartın example]. Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 23, 153-168.
Ünlü, İ. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programında kültür aktarımı konuları öğretiminin yeterlik düzeyinin incelenmesi [Examination of the proficiency level of teaching culture transfer subjects in social studies curriculum] [Master’s thesis, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü]. Erzurum.
Varış, F. (1990). Kültür ve eğitim [Culture and education]. 2.Milli Kültür Şurası Bildirileri, 5-8 Aralık 1989, Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Araştırma Planlama ve Koordinasyon Kurulu Başkanlığı Yayınları.
Yeldan, E. (2005). Küreselleşme sürecinde Türkiye ekonomisi, bölüşüm, birikim ve büyüme [Turkey’s economy in globalization process, distribution, accumulation and growth]. İletişim Yayınları.

Citation

Dogutas, A. (2020). Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

Dogutas, A. (2020). Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

Dogutas A. Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2020;4(3), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

Dogutas, Aysun. "Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2020 4 no. 3 (2020): 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

Dogutas, Aysun "Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 4, no. 3, 2020, pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559

Dogutas A. Effectiveness of School and Family on Enculturation: Perceptions of Students. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2020;4(3):83-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8559