Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design

Patrick G.   Corr; Leslie F.  Davidson

doi:10.29333/ajqr/12924

Patrick G. Corr ¹ ^* , Leslie F. Davidson ¹

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 149-167

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

OPEN ACCESS 709 Views 533 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the ways by which qualitative research is designed, participants are recruited and engaged, and results are shared regardless of research disciplines or epistemological perspectives. As a result of on-going requirements for social distancing and remote working or learning, researchers have had to redefine effective research methods by reimaging recruitment and data collection, investing in VoIP technology, and developing innovative ways to build trust across digital platforms. This manuscript explores how one Grounded Theory research study evolved in response to the emergence of COVID-19 and presents recommendations for innovative approaches to study design, data collection, and continuous participant interaction. We also briefly discuss ethical considerations that have emerged over the past two years.

Keywords: qualitative research, grounded theory, pandemic, online data collection

References

Alulema, D. (2019). DACA and the Supreme Court: How we got to this point, a statistical profile of who is affected, and what the future may hold for DACA beneficiaries. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 7(4), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331502419893674
Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273/
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Feminist qualitative research and grounded theory: Complexities, criticisms, and opportunities. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 417–436). SAGE Publications.
Burns, V.F., Macdonald, M.E., & Carnevale, F.A. (2018). Epistemological oppression and the road to awakening: A boot camp, a twitter storm, and a call to action! International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918763413
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). CDC museum, COVID-19 timeline. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practice guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Chong, C. H., & Yeo, K. J. (2015). An overview of grounded theory design in educational research. Asian Social Science, 11(12), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n12p258
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Currie, K. (2009). Using survey data to assist theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Nurse Researcher, 17(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2009.10.17.1.24.c7336
El Hussein, A., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., & Osuji, J. (2014). Using grounded theory as a method of inquiry: Advantages and disadvantages. The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1209
Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S.E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420
Engel, G.L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: The challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460
Gatchet, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581
George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
Jolie, S. A., Onyeka, O. C., Torres, S., DiClemente, C., Richards, M. & Santiago, C. D. (2021) Violence, place, and strengthened space: A review of immigration stress, violence exposure, and intervention for immigrant Latinx youth and families. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-100217
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2017). Focus group research methods. SAGE Publications.
Largent, E. A., & Fernandez Lynch, H. (2017). Paying research participants: Regulatory uncertainty, conceptual confusion, and a path forward. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 17(1), 61–141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29249912/
Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450144
Lederer, A.M., Hoban, M.T., Lipson, S.K., Zhou, S., & Eisenberg, D. (2020). More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of U.S. college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120969372
Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. (2016). Skype as a tool for research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L. (2020). Sanctuary cities: What global migration means for local governments. Social Sciences, 9(8), Article 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080146
Rowe, L. (2015). What judicial officers need to know about the HIPAA privacy rule. NASPA Journal, 43(4), 498-512.
Saldaña, J. (2009). Writing analytic memos. In J. Saldaña (Ed.), The coding manual for qualitative researchers (pp. 32–42). SAGE Publications.
Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. University of Minnesota Press.
Slekar, T.D. (2005). Without 1, where would we begin? Small sample research in educational settings. Journal of Thought, 40(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
United States Department of Education. (2018). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Government Printing Office.
World Health Organization (2022). United States of America: WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) statistics. https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/us

Citation

Corr, P. G., & Davidson, L. F. (2023). Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

Corr, P. G., and Davidson, L. F. (2023). Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), pp. 149-167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

Corr PG, Davidson LF. Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(1), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

Corr, Patrick G., and Leslie F. Davidson. "Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2023 7 no. 1 (2023): 149-167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

Corr, Patrick G. et al. "Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, pp. 149-167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924

Corr PG, Davidson LF. Conducting Grounded Theory Research in the Early Days of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Process Interruptions, Barriers, and Innovative Approaches to Study Design. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(1):149-67. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924