Using collaborative autoethnography to explore online doctoral mentoring: Finding empathy in mentor/protégé relationships
More details
Hide details
Bay Path University
Abilene Christian University
Abilene Christian University-Dallas
The United States Military Academy in West Point, NY
Online publish date: 2018-05-30
Publish date: 2018-05-31
American Journal of Qualitative Research 2018;2(1):57–76
We used collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to investigate how we, in our prior work as doctoral mentors at an online institution that assigned students to dissertation chairs, navigated the challenges associated with relationship deterioration with some of our student protégés. We explored how the process of reflection and interrogation might shape our future responses to conflict so that we might improve our strategies for successful and satisfying mentoring outcomes. We applied Rusbult, Zembrodt, and Gunn’s (1982) framework, with constructs Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect (EVLN), to examine specific cases from our work as dissertation mentors. Originally created to help explain responses to romantic relationship deterioration, we applied this framework to the dissertation mentor-protégé relationship in order to reflect on ways to improve student progress. Two themes from our analysis of each case emerged from the data. Each theme tied to the student’s behavior and the impact that behavior had on our collective perception. Implications are provided for mentoring students in online doctoral programs.
Jennifer O'Connor Duffy   
Bay Path University
1. Andrews, K. (2017). Culture, curriculum, and identity in education. [Book Review]. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 99-101.
2. Aslan, D. & Aydin, H. (2013). Voices: Turkish students' perceptions regarding the role of supplementary courses on academic achievement. The Anthropologist,16(3), 631- 643.
3. Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral.
4. student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5- 17.
5. Barefield, A. C. & Meyer, J. D. (2013). Leadership’s role in support of online academic programs: Implementing an administrative support matrix. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 1-13.
6. Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Archer, S. A. (2010). Characteristics that matter most: Doctoral students' perceptions of positive and negative advisor attributes. NACADA Journal, 30(1), 34-46.
7. Battaglia, D. & Battaglia, J. (2016). Faculty mentoring in communication sciences and disorders: Case study of doctoral teaching practicum. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 20(3), 1-11.
8. Brooks, J. G. (1999, December 30). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. [Review of the book, by C. Halpern]. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 32-36.
9. Burkard, A. W., Knox, S., DeWalt, T., Fuller, S., Hill, C., & Schlosser, L. Z. (2014). Dissertation experiences of doctoral graduates from professional psychology programs. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 27(1), 19-54.
10. Burner, K. (2014). From candidate to colleague: Mentoring online doctoral students. The Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1, 101–111.
11. Carothers, D. & Parfitt, C. (2017). Disability or language difference: How do we decide? American Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 1-12.
12. Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Left Coast Press.
13. Crawford, L. M., Randolph, J. J., & Yob, I. M. (2014). Theoretical development, factorial validity, and reliability of the Online Graduate Mentoring Scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 20-37.
14. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Damgaci-Koc, F. & Aydin, H. (2014). An analysis of academicians’ perceptions of multicultural education: A Turkish experience. The Anthropologist, 18(3), 817-833.
16. de Janasz, S. C., & Godshalk, V. M. (2013). The role of e-mentoring in protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 743–774. doi:10.1177/1059601113511296.
17. Deniz, M., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Examining the relationship of social skills, problem solving and bullying in adolescents. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 1 -7.
18. Dolan, V. (2011). The isolation of online adjunct faculty and its impact on their performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 62-77.
19. Doyle, N., Jacobs, K., & Ryan, C. (2016). Faculty mentors’ perspectives on e-mentoring post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 305-317.
20. Drigotas, S. M., Whitney, G. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). On the peculiarities of loyalty: A diary study of responses to dissatisfaction in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 596-609.
21. Elcigil, A., & Sari, H. (2008). Students' opinions about and expectations of effective nursing clinical mentors. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(3), 118-23.
22. Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 815–820.
23. Ellis, C. & Adams, T. E. (2014). The purposes, practices, and principles of autoethnographic research. In P. Leavy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Ersoy, E. (2015). Assessment of adolescent perceptions on parental attitudes on different variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 165-176.
25. Ersoy, E., & Ugur, H. (2015). The relationship between students’ self-esteem and parental attitudes in Turkish society. The Anthropologist, 21(1-2), 112-119.
26. Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
27. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708.
28. Gardner, S. K. (2010). Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 39-53.
29. Gearity, B. T., & Mertz, N. (2012). From "bitch" to "mentor": A doctoral student's story of self-change and mentoring. The Qualitative Report, 17(30), 1-27.
30. Gill, P., & Burnard, P. (2008). The student-supervisor relationship in the PhD/Doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 17(10), 668-671.
31. Golden, J. E. (2016). Supporting online faculty through communities of practice: Finding the faculty voice. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 84-93.
32. Goodman, S. B. (2006). Autonomy and guidance in doctoral advisement relationships: A dialectical study. The Humanistic Psychologist, 34(3), 201-222.
33. Grima, F. & Glaymann, D. (2012). A revisited analysis of the Exit-Voice-Loyalty-Neglect model: Contributions of a longitudinal and conceptually-extended approach. M@n@gement, 15(1), 1-41.
34. Harding-DeKam, J., Hamilton, B., & Loyd, S. (2012). The hidden curriculum of doctoral advising. NACADA Journal, 32(2), 5-16.
35. Hicks, D. (2011). The practice of mentoring: Reflecting on the critical aspects for leadership development. Australian Library Journal, 60(1), 66-74.
36. Houdyshell, M. (2017). Academic integrity in an emerging democracy: How university students in a former Soviet Republic balance achievement and success in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 14-25.
37. Hsiung, H., & Yang, K. (2012). Employee behavioral options in problematic working conditions: Response pattern analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(9), 1888-1907.
38. King, S. B., & Williams, F. K. (2014). Barriers to completing the dissertation as perceived by education leadership doctoral students. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 38(2), 275-279.
39. Knox, S., Burkard, A. W., Janecek, J., Pruitt, N. T., Fuller, S. L., & Hill, C. E. (2011). Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 24(1), 55-69.
40. Knox, S., Schlosser, L. Z., Pruitt, N. T., & Hill, C. E. (2006). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisor perspective. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(4), 489-518.
41. Kritsonis, W. A. (2011). Functions of the doctoral dissertation advisor. FOCUS on Colleges, Universities & Schools, 6(1), 1-5. Retrieved from
42. Lafer, S. (2014). Democratic design for the humanization of education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 6-12.
43. Li, S., & Seale, C. (2007). Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: A qualitative case study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 511-526.
44. Liechty, J. M., Liao, M., & Schull, C. P. (2009). Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoral students in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(3), 481-497.
45. Mason, M. (2016). Mentoring and socialization of future student affairs officers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(4), 72-79.
46. Michou, A., Mouratidis, A., Ersoy, E., & Uğur, H. (2016). Social achievement goals, needs satisfaction, and coping among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 260-265.
47. Murakami-Ramalho, E., Piert, J., & Militello, M. (2008). The wanderer, the chameleon, and the warrior: Experiences of doctoral students of color developing a research identity in educational administration. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 806-834.
48. Naus, F., van Iterson, A., & Roe, R. (2007). Organizational cynicism: Extending the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect model of employees' responses to adverse conditions in the workplace. Human Relations, 60(5), 683-718.
49. Peluso, D. L., Carleton, R. N., Richter, A. A., & Asmundson, G. J. (2011). The graduate advising relationship in Canadian psychology programmes: Advisee perspectives. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 52(1), 29-40.
50. Pine, G. J. (2009). Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Puzziferro, M. & Shelton, K. (2009). Supporting online faculty--Revisiting the seven principles (a few years later). Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(3). Retrieved from
52. Rusbult, C. E. (1993). Understanding responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships: The exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. In S. Worchel & J. A. Simpson (eds.), Conflict between People and Groups: Causes, Processes, and Resolutions (pp. 30-59). Chicago, IL, England: Nelson-Hall, Inc.
53. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous III, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job status satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
54. Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Determinants and consequences of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in adult romantic involvements. Human Relations, 39(1), 45-64.
55. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, Paul A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 351.
56. Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53-78.
57. Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1230-1242.
58. Saldaña J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Samuel, R. E. & Kohun, F. G. (2010). Managing perceived coping behavior while mentoring doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 29-37.
60. Schniederjans, D., Schniederjans, M., & Levy, Y. (2012). Equity theory based strategies for students on overcoming problems in Ph.D. dissertation committees. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 221-234. Retrieved from
61. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
62. Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199-219. Retrieved from
63. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Tenenbaum, H. R. Crosby, F. J. & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 326-341. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1804.
65. Terosky, A. L. & Heasley, H. (2015). Supporting online faculty through a sense of community and collegiality. Online Learning, 19(3), 147-161.
66. Trinkner, R. (2014). Procedural justice and the advisor-advisee relationship in graduate education. The Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1, 23–40.
67. van Berkhout, E. T., & Malouff, J. M. (2015). The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 32-41. doi: 10.1037/cou0000093.
68. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B. & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 33, 455–472.
69. Wayessa, B., S. (2017). We are not alone: conceptualizing people-things relationship in Oromo community in North America. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 34-43.
70. Yigit, I. H., & Tatch, A. (2017). Syrian refugees and Americans: Perceptions, attitudes and insights. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 13-31.
71. Yob, I. & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2), 34-47.