Gangs and environment: A comparative analysis of prison and street gangs
 
More details
Hide details
1
Indiana University Southeast
Online publish date: 2018-06-01
Publish date: 2018-06-01
 
American Journal of Qualitative Research 2018;2(1):97–117
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
One misconception in gang research is the assumption that prison gangs and street gangs are organizationally and ideologically synonymous. Although in the minority, some researchers suggest that prison gangs are qualitatively and quantitatively different from other gangs (Fleisher & Decker, 2001). Utilizing 30 in-depth semi-structured interviews with formerly incarcerated gang members in the New England area, this article assesses the effect of environment on the organizational structure, ideologies, and practices of prison and street gangs. The analysis presents a comparative model of prison and street gangs that highlights differences across major aspects of each type of organization, including membership, leadership, organizational operations, and relationships with authority figures. These findings suggest a need for researchers to explore prison and street gangs as distinct entities each affected by their respective environments. Policy suggestions and directions for future research are discussed.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Jennifer M. Ortiz   
Indiana University Southeast
 
REFERENCES (48):
1. Beaumont de, G., & Tocqueville, A. (1833). On the penitentiary system in the United States and its applications in France. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard.
2. Bentham, M. (2014). Scotland Yard officers dump gang members on rivals turf after questioning them. London Evening Standard. Retrieved from www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/....
3. Bernard, H.R. & Ryan, G.W. (2009). Analyzing qualitative data: Systemic approaches. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
4. Bowker, L. H. (1980). Prison victimization. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
5. Brotherton, D. & Barrios, L. (2004). The almighty Latin King and queen nation: Street Politics and the transformation of a New York City street gang. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
6. Brotherton, D. & Barrios, L. (2011). Banished to the homeland: Dominican deportees and their stories of exile. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7. Camp, G.M. & Camp, C. G. (1985). Prison gangs: Their extent, nature, and impact on prisons. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Clemmers, D. (1940). The prison community. New York, NY: Holt.
9. Cohen, A., Cole, G., & Bailey, R.G. (1976). Prison Violence. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10. Cohen, S. & Taylor, L. (1972). Psychological survival: The experience of long-term imprisonment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11. Damgacı, F. K., & Aydın, H. (2013). Türkiye’deki Eğitim Fakültelerinde Görev Yapan Akademisyenlerin Çokkültürlü Eğitime İlişkin Görüşleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 314-331.
12. Decker, S.H., Bynum, T.S., & Weisel, D.L. (1998). Gangs as organized crime groups: A tale of two cities. Justice Quarterly, 15 (2), 395-423.
13. Deniz, M., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Examining the Relationship of Social Skills, Problem Solving and Bullying in Adolescents. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 1 -7.
14. Diego Vigil, J (2002). A rainbow of gangs: Street cultures in the mega city. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
15. Edward, S. (2011, March). Video: Questionable police actions caught on tape. WBEZ 91.5: City Room. Retrieved from http://www.wbez.org/blog/city-....
16. Erikkson, P., Henttonen, E., & Merilainen, S. (2012). Ethnographic field notes and reflexivity. Pp. 9-22 in Loshini Naidoo (Ed.). An ethnography of global landscapes and corridors. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
17. Esbensen, F., Winfree, L.T., He, N., Taylor, T.J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime & Delinquency, 47 (1), 105-130.
18. Faugier, J. & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advance Nursing, 26 (4), 790-797.
19. Fleisher, M.S., & Decker, S.H. (2001). An overview of the challenge of prison gangs. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5 (1), 1-9.
20. Fortune, S.H. (2003). Inmate and prison gang leadership. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
21. Gaes, G.G., Wallace, S., Gilman, E., Klein-Saffran, J., & Suppa, S. (2001). The influence of prison gang affiliation on violence and other prison misconduct. The Prison Journal, 82 (3): 359-385.
22. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
23. Guest, G. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
24. Hemmens, C., & Atherton, E. (2000). Use of force: Current practice and policy. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
25. Hemmens, C., & Stohr, M. K. (2001). Correctional staff attitudes regarding the use of force in corrections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 26–39.
26. Hunt, G., Riegel, S., Morales, T., & Waldorf, D. (1993). Changes in prison culture: Prison gangs and the case of the “Pepsi generation”. Social Problems, 40 (3), 398-409.
27. Irwin, J. (1980). Prisons in turmoil. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
28. Jacobs, J.B. (1977). Statesville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kaya, I. & Aydin, H. (2014). Pluralism, Multiculturalism and Bilingual Education [Çoğulculuk, Çokkültürlü ve İkidilli Eğitim]. Ankara: Ani Press.
30. Lafer, S. (2014). Democratic Design for the Humanization of Education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 6-12.
31. Lait, M. & Glover, S. (2003, March ). Two officers are sued over teen slaying. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/20....
32. Low, S.M. & Lawrence-Zuniga, D. (2003). The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
33. Marimow, A. & Wagner, J. (2013, April). 13 correctional officers indicted in Maryland, accused of aiding gang’s drug scheme. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com....
34. Maxwell, J.A. & Miller, B.A. (2007). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In P. Hesse-Biber (Ed.) Emergent Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications.
35. McCarthy, B. J., Jr. (1996). Keeping and eye on the keeper: Prison corruption and its control. In M. C. Braswell, B. R. McCarthy, & B. J. McCarthy (Eds.), Justice, crime and ethics (2nd ed., pp. 229–241). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
36. Michou, A., Mouratidis, A., Ersoy, E., & Uğur, H. (2016). Social achievement goals, needs satisfaction, and coping among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 260-265.
37. Parenti, C. (1999). Lockdown America: Police and prisons in the age of crisis. New York, NY: Verso.
38. Rhodes, L.A. (2001). Toward an anthropology of prisons. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 65-83.
39. Rodgers, D. & Jensen, S. (2008). Revolutionaries, barbarians or war machines? Gangs in Nicaragua and South Africa. Socialist Register, 45: 220-238.
40. Saldana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Schwirtz, M. & Winerip, M. (January 15th, 2015). Warning signs overlooked in hiring for New York City jails: Agency report finds criminal histories and gang ties among Rikers officers. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01....
42. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York, NY: Columbia University Teaching College.
43. Skarbek, D. (2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Suliman, M., Shah, M., Ullah, A., & Jamal, H. (2016). Ethnicity Based Social Exclusion of Nomads in Khyber District Malakand, Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 11-19.
45. Sykes, G. M. (1958). Society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Trammell, R. (2009). Values, rules, and keeping the peace: How men describe order and the inmate code in California prisons. Deviant Behavior, 30 (8), 746-771.
47. Wang, T. (2015). Marginality of rural migrant students in eleven Chinese high schools. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 21-32.
48. Yigit, I. H., & Tatch, A. (2017). Syrian refugees and Americans: Perceptions, attitudes and insights. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 13-31.
eISSN:2576-2141